Table 1

Results of canonical phylogenetic ordination of AFLP data



Variation explained¶



Node ¥
Marginal effects† λ1
Conditional effects‡ λa
P-Value#

Phylogenetic groups according to mtDNA-based phylogeny




S. galilaeus sensu lato incl. Barombi taxa *
1
0.15
0.10
0.000
S. galilaeus sensu lato w/o S. g. sanagaensis incl. Barombi taxa
2
0.12
0.05
n.s.
S. galilaeus w/o S. g. sanagaensis excluding Barombi taxa
3
0.15
-
n.s.
S. g. multifasciatus *
4
0.18
0.13
0.000
S. galilaeus w/o S. g. sanagaensis and S. g. multifasciatus
5
0.12
-
n.s.
S. galilaeus "Meme" *
6
0.10
0.08
0.000
"Cross-clade" + S. g. "Niger"
7
0.10
-
n.s.
"Cross-clade" *
8
0.09
0.07
0.001
"Barombi Mbo clade" *
9
0.18
0.11
0.000
Stomatepia ssp.*
10
0.08
0.06
0.000
St. mongo *
11
0.07
0.05
0.054
St. mariae *
12
0.06
0.05
0.008
St. pindu *
13
0.05
-
n.s.
St. mariae St. pindu
14
0.06
-
n.s.
Pungu maclareni Konia ssp.
15
0.07
0.05
0.025
Konia ssp. *
16
0.06
0.06
0.001
Pungu maclareni *
17
0.06
-
n.s.
Konia eisentrauti *
18
0.05
0.04
n.s.
Konia dikume *
19
0.05
-
n.s.
Myaka myaka *
20
0.05
0.04
n.s.
Sarotherodon lohbergeri *
21
0.06
0.04
n.s.
Sarotherodon steinbachi *
22
0.05
-
n.s.
"Barombi Sarotherodon clade"
23
0.08
-
n.s.
Phylogenetic groups according to AFLP-phylogeny




Myaka + S. caroli/S.linnellii
27
0.07
-
n.s.
Pungu + S. lohbergeri/S. steinbachi
28
0.07
-
n.s.
St. mongo + St. pindu
29
0.07
-
n.s.
S. galilaeus s. l. incl. Barombi taxa w/o S.g.multifasciatus and S.g. "Niger"
30
0.21
0.21
0.000
S. lohbergeri + S. steinbachi
31
0.06
-
n.s.
S. linnellii + S. caroli
32
0.06
-
n.s.
S. sp. "mudfeeder" + S. sp. "bighead"
33
0.08
0.05
0.013
Hypothetical ancient syngameons according to conflict between mtDNA-based and AFLP-based phylogenetic hypotheses
groups ¥¥



P. maclareni + Konia ssp. + S. lohbergeri + S. steinbachi
red (24)
0.08
0.06
0.002
M. myaka + S. caroli + S. linnellii + S. lohbergeri + S. steinbachi
green (25)
0.09
-
n.s.
S. g. sanagaensis + S. galilaeus w/o S. g. multifasciatus. S. g. "Niger"
blue (26)
0.15
-
n.s.

Each phylogenetic group as identified by nodes in phylogenetic analyses of mtDNA-, or AFLP-data or by the conflict between the data sets (hypothetical syngameons) was tested for their explanatory value in explaining variance in the AFLP data set.

¥ Node numbers correspond to encircled node numbers for mtDNA-clades and AFLP-clades supported in Fig. 1.

¥¥ Groups refer to hypothetical syngameons as indicated by coloured blocks in Fig. 1a and b.

¶ "Variation explained" refers to eigenvalues of each phylogenetic group that explain part of the variation in the pruned AFLP-data (2355 loci / 33 samples identical to those in Fig. 1a. Sum of all unconstrained eigenvalues was 1.667, sum of all canonical eigenvalues 1.179.

† Marginal effects refer to eigenvalues ("fit") of each phylogenetic group if taken singly as the only variable on the pruned AFLP data set.

‡ Conditional effects refer to the increase in eigenvalues ("additional fit") of each phylogenetic group as selected by automatic forward selection.

# P-values refer to the significance level of the conditional effects as obtained with a Monte Carlo permutation test under the full model with 9999 random permutations.

* mtDNA-clades as indicated in Fig. 1b that are compatible with clades as identified by the AFLP phylogenetic tree in Fig. 1a.

Schliewen and Klee Frontiers in Zoology 2004 1:5   doi:10.1186/1742-9994-1-5