Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessResearch

Sexual dimorphism and population divergence in the Lake Tanganyika cichlid fish genus Tropheus

Juergen Herler1,2 email, Michaela Kerschbaumer1 email, Philipp Mitteroecker2 email, Lisbeth Postl1 email and Christian Sturmbauer1 email

Institute of Zoology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Department of Theoretical Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

author email corresponding author email

Frontiers in Zoology 2010, 7:4doi:10.1186/1742-9994-7-4

Published: 22 January 2010

Abstract

Background

With about 120 colour morphs currently assigned to six nominal species, the genus Tropheus is an ideal model to study evolutionary divergence of populations in allopatry. The morphology of Tropheus has been described as relatively static, but reproductive constraints are sexually dimorphic due to mouthbrooding in females. We analysed phenotypic variation in six populations of T. moorii and one population of T. polli using geometric morphometrics to assess morphological differences among sexes in relation to the differentiation of populations and species.

Results

The mean shapes differed significantly between sexes, populations, and species even though within-sex variation exceeded the divergence among populations. The first principal component of Procrustes shape coordinates revealed differences between populations and species in mouth position and ventral head shape. The second principal component reflected sex-specific shape differences, mainly comprising a relatively larger female viscerocranium and, in particular, a larger buccal area. While shape variation between populations and between sexes was primarily located in the cranial region, within-sex variation was relatively uniform across all landmarks.

Conclusions

Deviations of the between-population and between-sex pattern of shape variation from that within sex indicate that the differences in head shape likely result from both adaptations to female mouthbrooding and population-specific foraging strategies.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.